At
150 Million views on YouTube, South Korean hip-hop artist PSY's song
and music video for "Gangnam Style" has gone beyond viral. On statistics
and hype alone, chances are you've heard of it as well.
Being an avid follower of K-pop for the last four years (and the
Korean entertainment culture as a result), I had previously heard of PSY
through his entertainment agency, YG, who backs the likes of K-pop big
wigs Big Bang and 2NE1.
34 Years old and in the game for more
than a decade, PSY was known for being a K-entertainment vet, well
respected for his talents in rap lyricism, energy and stage charisma.
My
social media feeds have been drowning in updates and links on PSY for
the past month. As my very hands type this to you right now, another
friend has just linked me to a PSY concert in New York City. This kind
of publicity, this kind of hype in the US market is what K-pop artists have been fighting the hard fight for, for years. The
girl group Wondergirls had even moved to the United States for two years
in 2009 to try to make even a dent in the U.S. market, with little to
no avail. 9-person girl group Girls Generation's American apex occurred
when they performed their English single "The Boys" on Late Night with
David Letterman in early 2012.
K-pop has never seen what is currently happening
with the PSY phenomenon, and fellow K-pop artists and South Korean
citizens themselves are filled with bewildered pride.
The popularity of the "Gangnam Style" song and music video had left me wondering as well just what
the pull was for the American audience. What makes him so palatable
for American consumption? As mentioned before, 34-year old PSY hovers a
tad older than the usual Top 40 artist. His childlike facial features and
stocky appearance don't leave many arguing sex appeal. Not your typical pop sensation, to say the least.
I do believe that
"Gangnam Style" is an accurate example of PSY's talents in rap, energy and just
being a good entertainer, but I also believe these traits are
overshadowed (for most of the American audience, anyway) by the sheer
kitsch of the song and video. I argue that "Gangnam Style's" cartoon-y,
wacky appearance feeds perfectly into many American's Orientalist and racializing belief of
the sexless, camp Asian male.
Only earlier this year were American sports enthusiasts having
trouble choking down the idea of an Asian American male in the NBA.
Comments about the nature of this player's anatomy, intelligence and overall
Chinese-ness were made- comments that were saddening but unsurprising to me.
With the lack of representation of Asians and Asian Americans in
mainstream American media, much of the American public is still
hopelessly unaware of the variation and nuance of Asians and Asian
Americans apart from old, tired tropes. Seeing an Asian American in the
NBA just didn't make sense. Masculinity? National sports league? But how
does he even see the ball?
But here comes PSY, and he makes sense. Like the William Hungs
and Long Duk Dongs before him, PSY is a camp character for the American
audience. He poses no sexual threat, he speaks with an accent, and he
dances a funny dance. Because of this, it is so easy to other-ize PSY,
to clump him with the Asian male spectacles before him. The kitsch of
PSY and "Gangnam Style" is relevant in Korea because it holds meaning
behind it- the irony is apparent and they laugh with him. But when placed, out of context, in America,
that cultural meaning is left behind. Pluck something or someone culturally relevant in one country and drop
it into another- and we turn that thing (and its meanings) on its head.
It is so unfortunate for me to see an entertainer with such natural talent, charisma, and most of all, years and years of experience, be boiled down to 30 seconds of a dance step. And PSY dances this step shamelessly wherever he goes- Dodger's games, red carpets. PSY and his people are in on it too- they know it is what the American public wants to see, but unfortunately, this just creates more of a synonymic nature- PSY is this dance, and this dance is PSY. Everything else is overlooked, and thus, PSY becomes monolithic and therefore a canvas for projected stereotyping.
PSY is getting so much attention, and so much American media coverage, but it is inundated with what seems to be just another construction of Asian male kitsch.
The cultural disconnect between PSY in Korea and PSY in America is astounding. The consumption of PSY in America is palatable because he feeds historically into what America has come to know and love- the stereotype of the laughable, non-threatening Asian male. Attitudes of the dismissive "...meanwhile in Japan" meme come to mind as the
mainstream "understanding" that Asian countries much like Japan are
wacky beyond comprehension. We don't understand, but it is silly, and it is easy, so let's sit back and laugh.
Viral sensations are known to be one-hit wonders. I do hope for PSY's success in America, and I am hoping that audiences will see beyond the character he is currently being portrayed to be. Recently having signed with the managers behind Justin Bieber, I do believe some are in tune to PSY's talent and potential with American audiences. We'll just have to wait and see.
I absolutely agree. What makes it really fascinating for me is that Psy knows what they're making him out to be. He's made comments before how "Americans find me funny the way that Koreans find Eddie Murphy doing the Klumps is funny." And even the way he has to introduce himself in that Ellen clip, it's really absurd.
ReplyDeleteGangnam Style is the new Macarena of our times. I was too young back then to even fathom (or care, honestly) how those dudes were perceived in the 90s but at least between the 90s and early 2000s there was a market in America for Latin pop music.
I definitely think Orientalist (and let's be real, racist) attitudes towards Asians and Asian Americans prevents an Asian pop market from happening.
I've seen it argued on the internets that people actually really love this song and aren't really laughing at Psy but IDK MAN, at the same time they can't blame us for being suspicious about this given the history of representation (or lack of) in the media.
Excellent post!
ReplyDelete